The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris
The Consumer Fraud Attorney Serving California
CONTACT US TODAY
Call Today619-985-4462
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Class Action
  • results
  • Meet the Team
  • as seen in the news
  • Blog
  • Giving Back
  • Contact
  • Business Litigation Overview
    • Contingency Fees For Business Litigation
    • Contract Disputes
The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris
The Consumer Fraud Attorney Serving California
Call Today 619-985-4462
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Class Action
  • results
  • Meet the Team
  • as seen in the news
  • Blog
  • Giving Back
  • Contact
  • Business Litigation Overview
    ▼
    • Contingency Fees For Business Litigation
    • Contract Disputes

Consumer protection concern leads to $500K order

June 28, 2017Stephen MorrisConsumer Protection

It seems like a relatively simple idea – someone is hired to do a job, payment for the job is made and the completed product is delivered. Fortunately, this is what happens the majority of the time. But, in those instances where the completed product is never delivered, the California consumer may have cause to bring a consumer protection claim.

One’s wedding day is a special occasion of which the bride and groom want mementos. For this reason, they usually will hire a photographer and a videographer. The photographer is charged with capturing the fine details and providing pictures to be treasured. On the other hand, the videographer captures the entire ceremony so that the bride and groom can enjoy watching it as it actually happened.

Along with many other products that can be ordered, this type of video is one that cannot be recreated. If it is not delivered, the bride and groom cannot just find someone else to do the job. Thus, when one such company contracted to provide this type of service and then failed to deliver for at least 100 couples, its owners were ordered to pay over $500,000 for failure to adhere to the Consumer Protection Act.

Not every item that one orders is as special as a wedding video. However, when a California consumer pays for something, he or she expects to receive it, or at least a refund. If this is not the case, it may be time to take further action and consult with an attorney to discuss possible consumer protection action.

Source: foxbaltimore.com, “Silver Spring wedding video company forced to pay $500K for deceiving customers“, Bryna Zumer, June 9, 2017

Tags: consumer protection

Related Articles

Graco recall possible consumer protection concern

May 31, 2017Stephen Morris

Identity theft has become a significant consumer protection issue

February 8, 2017Stephen Morris

Student loan processing company at heart of consumer protection

January 24, 2017Stephen Morris

Recent Posts

  • Promoting Inequality in the USA
  • Consumer protection a concern for ice cream company
  • Consumer protection concern leads to $500K order
  • Consumer protection lawsuit settled with charitable organization
  • Graco recall possible consumer protection concern

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2018
    • October 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016

    Categories

    • Consumer Protection

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Contact Us For An Initial Consultation

    Bold labels are required.


    • Please prove you are human by selecting the Plane.

    Office Location

    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris 
    2305 Historic Decatur Rd. Suite 100
    San Diego, CA 92106

    Phone: 619-985-4462 
    Map & Directions 

    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris is based in San Diego. We handle claims throughout California.

    © 2020 by
    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy