The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris
The Consumer Fraud Attorney Serving California
CONTACT US TODAY
Call Today619-985-4462
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Class Action
  • results
  • Meet the Team
  • as seen in the news
  • Blog
  • Giving Back
  • Contact
  • Business Litigation Overview
    • Contingency Fees For Business Litigation
    • Contract Disputes
The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris
The Consumer Fraud Attorney Serving California
Call Today 619-985-4462
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Class Action
  • results
  • Meet the Team
  • as seen in the news
  • Blog
  • Giving Back
  • Contact
  • Business Litigation Overview
    ▼
    • Contingency Fees For Business Litigation
    • Contract Disputes

Popular coffee product source of consumer protection concerns

April 19, 2017Stephen MorrisConsumer Protection

The average California consumer drinks at least one cup of coffee a day. In fact, research suggests that over two-thirds of the nation drink at least one cup of coffee each day. This consumption trend thus implies the need for products that will safely support this coffee habit. Unfortunately, while there are numerous products available, some of these products have raised consumer protection concerns.

One of the latest trends in coffee consumption has been in the form of the coffee pot itself. Previously, the consumer would use coffee grounds and make either an entire pot or a partial one. However, the current trend is to make individual cups using a Keurig machine. This single-serve machine allows each consumer to make the exact type of coffee desired.

Even with these single-serve machines, however, safety is a concern. Recently, the Consumer Product Safety Commission released information stating that Keurig knew about a burn risk with its products, yet, they failed to report it. Apparently, over 200 individuals report suffering second or third degree burns as a result of their machine spraying hot water on them. As a result, Keurig has been order to pay in excess of $5 million in penalties.

When a California consumer purchases or receives a product, he or she expects it to perform as indicated. Additionally, the consumer expects the product to perform without causing injury to the individual using it. When these expectations are not met and the individual suffers as a result, the individual may want to pursue a consumer protection claim. An experienced attorney can help guide this process.

Source: finance.yahoo.com, “Keurig Settlement Over Burn Injuries“, April 17, 2017

Tags: consumer protection

Related Articles

Consumer protection may be overlooked by used car industry

May 13, 2017Stephen Morris

In-Shape to pay $26 million for unfair business practices

September 9, 2016Stephen Morris

What exactly is a class action lawsuit?

June 28, 2016Stephen Morris

Recent Posts

  • Promoting Inequality in the USA
  • Consumer protection a concern for ice cream company
  • Consumer protection concern leads to $500K order
  • Consumer protection lawsuit settled with charitable organization
  • Graco recall possible consumer protection concern

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2018
    • October 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016

    Categories

    • Consumer Protection

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Contact Us For An Initial Consultation

    Bold labels are required.


    • Please prove you are human by selecting the Key.

    Office Location

    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris 
    2305 Historic Decatur Rd. Suite 100
    San Diego, CA 92106

    Phone: 619-985-4462 
    Map & Directions 

    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris is based in San Diego. We handle claims throughout California.

    © 2020 by
    The Law Offices of Stephen B. Morris. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy